Comments on: Re-framing the problem: Social Interaction Design

By: Roselia Sciortino

Roselia Sciortino — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:23:38 +0000

You really make it appear really easy along with your presentation but I in finding this matter to be really something which I feel I would never understand. It kind of feels too complicated and very extensive for me. I am looking forward in your subsequent post, I will try to get the cling of it!

By: luxury suv comparison

luxury suv comparison — Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:01:20 +0000

http://www.lbknews.com/2010/06/15/5177/

By: Best Tips On Getting Pregnant

Best Tips On Getting Pregnant — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:12:37 +0000

10 Parenting Tips For All New Parents…

[...] If you are like most parents, in all probability want to parent sound, smart kids. You may already have some ideas on how to accomplish this. Here are some nurturing tips that will aid parents ensure their kids develop to their full potential. On…

By: Social Interaction Design Model « design thesis

Social Interaction Design Model « design thesis — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:34:29 +0000

[...] is an interesting article calling to action a new model for designing for social interaction. Adrian Canne describes the [...]

By: Social Interaction Design Model « fullofdesign

Social Interaction Design Model « fullofdesign — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:13:15 +0000

[...] Interaction Design Model 15 09 2009 This is an interesting article calling to action a new model for designing for social interaction. Adrian Canne describes the [...]

By: Johnny Holland - It’s all about interaction » Re-framing the problem: Social Interaction Design

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:33:59 +0000

[...] The rest is here: Johnny Holland – It’s all about interaction » Re-framing the problem: Social Interaction Design [...]

By: Putting People First in italiano » Re-framing the problem: design dell’interazione sociale

Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:19:14 +0000

[...] Leggi l’articolo Scrivi un commento [...]

By: Twitted by sharong

Twitted by sharong — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:51:52 +0000

[...] This post was Twitted by sharong [...]

By: David Barrie

David Barrie — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:47:43 +0000

I’ve run a couple of urban renewal programs in the past in the U.K. that have established narratives over time which have provided enough access points and have had sufficient eclat for people to want to self-organize, join in and provide their own chapter in the story. Each new chapter changes the story in some way and re-frames the frame. Because the entire programs haven’t been locked in to government funding rounds but people have raised finance as they go for their projects – much like film producers – different sub-initiatives have been able to progress and deliver at their own natural speeds. worth thinking about. good to meet u here.

By: Adrian Chan

Adrian Chan — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:26:35 +0000

David,

Thanks for your comment — will check out butetown. Interesting point on collective action, collectives, collective economies (which are different things of course). I’ve been wondering whether hunch.com is an attempt to apply wiki-like collectivism to decision making and recommendations.

Which is a tough nut to crack, given that decisions are personal and decision reasons/selections are subjective. Different problem as they’re trying to get use collective (anonymous, impersonal, non-social) decision making to create objectivity in the logical choices involved in making a choice (say, best 70s movie).

But where wikipedia can leverage the commitment many of its users/contributors have to “truth” and accuracy, which is an impersonal and non-social mentality and thus is in line with the site’s interaction model, the interaction model for hunch.com is personal, and subjective. It’s about the choices each person makes when making a decision: none of which is objective.

Clay Shirky argues that collective action is the most difficult and rare of social action. I’ve been thinking about whether or not it’s a contradiction in terms, or an outcome that can in fact be structured. Perhaps it’s more accurate to say that collective action is a contradiction in terms but that collective outcomes are not. (Insofar as “action” is a motivated act, I dont see how individuals can act for a collective — that would be social action to me, group action, community or what have you — membership based and thus cooperative, collaborative but not “collective”)…

Which brings us full circle perhaps: it would take an interaction framework sensitive to actions and reactions, statements and responses, or the contingencies of acts and responses, to shape interaction models capable of using personally or socially motivated acts to produce collective results. … Worth thinking about. If we’re to have success turning back climate change, I think it’s going to take just this kind of a system.