<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s all about interaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The User Centric Approach to the Creation of a Law Firm Intranet. &#171; The Law Firm Intranet</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111674</link>
		<dc:creator>The User Centric Approach to the Creation of a Law Firm Intranet. &#171; The Law Firm Intranet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111674</guid>
		<description>[...] about busting myths often held in regards to online usability testing in his 4/9/2010 article, Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing in the Johnny Holland Magazine.  His focus of the article is online usability testing rather than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about busting myths often held in regards to online usability testing in his 4/9/2010 article, Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing in the Johnny Holland Magazine.  His focus of the article is online usability testing rather than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Mula</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111673</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Mula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111673</guid>
		<description>Good article. But here is a block I had to reading it smoothly - the use of the word &quot;verbatim&quot;, as in &quot;...Verbatim comments... verbatim responses....&quot; I could not figure out what word was actually meant. No user can give you feedback &quot;verbatim&quot; unless they are quoting someone/something else and doing it &quot;verbatim&quot; -  word-for-word identical quote.

verbatim &#124;vərˈbātəm&#124; adverb &amp; adjective
in exactly the same words as were used originally : [as adv. ] subjects were instructed to recall the passage verbatim &#124; [as adj. ] your quotations must be verbatim.
ORIGIN late 15th cent.: from medieval Latin, from Latin verbum ‘word.’ Compare with literatim .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. But here is a block I had to reading it smoothly &#8211; the use of the word &#8220;verbatim&#8221;, as in &#8220;&#8230;Verbatim comments&#8230; verbatim responses&#8230;.&#8221; I could not figure out what word was actually meant. No user can give you feedback &#8220;verbatim&#8221; unless they are quoting someone/something else and doing it &#8220;verbatim&#8221; &#8211;  word-for-word identical quote.</p>
<p>verbatim |vərˈbātəm| adverb &amp; adjective<br />
in exactly the same words as were used originally : [as adv. ] subjects were instructed to recall the passage verbatim | [as adj. ] your quotations must be verbatim.<br />
ORIGIN late 15th cent.: from medieval Latin, from Latin verbum ‘word.’ Compare with literatim .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Albert</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111672</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 01:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111672</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric,

Good point. We actually call these consistency checks in our book. They are quite effective as well. In fact, one of the side benefits of SUS is that it can be used as a consistency check given the alternating positive/negative worded statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric,</p>
<p>Good point. We actually call these consistency checks in our book. They are quite effective as well. In fact, one of the side benefits of SUS is that it can be used as a consistency check given the alternating positive/negative worded statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Reiss</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111671</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Reiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111671</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing up speedbumps in surveys. I do something similar, but in a slightly more subtle way: I ask the same question twice, but introduce a negative in one of the questions so that in order to answer both honestly, the respondent will have to answer these at opposite ends of the scale:

&quot;Was it easy to find the information you needed?&quot;

&quot;Was it difficult to find the information you needed?&quot;

Now I&#039;m wondering which of these two ways is better - or do they complement each other. Perhaps your straightforward question actually provides more accurate feedback. Opinion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing up speedbumps in surveys. I do something similar, but in a slightly more subtle way: I ask the same question twice, but introduce a negative in one of the questions so that in order to answer both honestly, the respondent will have to answer these at opposite ends of the scale:</p>
<p>&#8220;Was it easy to find the information you needed?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Was it difficult to find the information you needed?&#8221;</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m wondering which of these two ways is better &#8211; or do they complement each other. Perhaps your straightforward question actually provides more accurate feedback. Opinion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111670</guid>
		<description>Great article. Great breakdown.

I have to agree a lot of usability services are overpriced, but I think this will change in due course. We&#039;ve recently introduced our own usability testing service at http://intuitionhq.com at $9 a test, which we think is really reasonable and works well for freelancers or smaller design studios.

A lot of our job is educating clients about usability testing, and the value that can be gained from in. In that respect, articles like this are invaluable. I think people are starting to have more awareness of what the web could be like if usability and the user experience have more of a focus, and I&#039;m really hopeful this trend will continue long term.

Thanks again for the great read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Great breakdown.</p>
<p>I have to agree a lot of usability services are overpriced, but I think this will change in due course. We&#8217;ve recently introduced our own usability testing service at <a href="http://intuitionhq.com" rel="nofollow">http://intuitionhq.com</a> at $9 a test, which we think is really reasonable and works well for freelancers or smaller design studios.</p>
<p>A lot of our job is educating clients about usability testing, and the value that can be gained from in. In that respect, articles like this are invaluable. I think people are starting to have more awareness of what the web could be like if usability and the user experience have more of a focus, and I&#8217;m really hopeful this trend will continue long term.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putting people first &#187; Debunking the myths of online usability testing</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111669</link>
		<dc:creator>Putting people first &#187; Debunking the myths of online usability testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111669</guid>
		<description>[...] Read article         &#160;    Leave a Reply [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read article         &nbsp;    Leave a Reply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most Tweeted Articles by Product Management Experts</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111668</link>
		<dc:creator>Most Tweeted Articles by Product Management Experts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111668</guid>
		<description>[...] Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing Johnny Holland &#8211; It&#039;s all about ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing Johnny Holland &#8211; It&#39;s all about &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mal kurz rundgeschaut&#8230; #20 &#124; Braekling.de</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111667</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal kurz rundgeschaut&#8230; #20 &#124; Braekling.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111667</guid>
		<description>[...] Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing &#8211; Usability bei Johnny Holland. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing &#8211; Usability bei Johnny Holland. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most Tweeted Articles by Product Management Experts</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111666</link>
		<dc:creator>Most Tweeted Articles by Product Management Experts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111666</guid>
		<description>[...] readers choice, I write on whatever topics people submit and vote for. ...         2  Tweets     &#187; Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing Johnny Holland &#8211; It&#039;s all about ...            2  Tweets     &#187; Some Startup QA Tactics &#8211; Browsers, Emails, and Bugs The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] readers choice, I write on whatever topics people submit and vote for. &#8230;         2  Tweets     &raquo; Debunking the Myths of Online Usability Testing Johnny Holland &#8211; It&#39;s all about &#8230;            2  Tweets     &raquo; Some Startup QA Tactics &#8211; Browsers, Emails, and Bugs The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: User Experience, Usability and Design links for April 9th &#124; BlobFisk.com</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/04/debunking-the-myths-of-online-usability-testing/#comment-111665</link>
		<dc:creator>User Experience, Usability and Design links for April 9th &#124; BlobFisk.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=6758#comment-111665</guid>
		<description>[...] Debunking the myths of online usability testingThe motivation for this article is to help UX researchers keep an open mind about online usability testing. There are some researchers who have been using this approach for years and find it useful (in certain situations). Others are new to it, and wanting to learn more about its strength and limitations. Finally, some UX researchers have already formed an opinion about online usability testing, and deemed it not useful for a variety of (unfounded) reasons. I hope by exposing these myths, we (as a UX community) can evaluate this tool based on its actual merits. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debunking the myths of online usability testingThe motivation for this article is to help UX researchers keep an open mind about online usability testing. There are some researchers who have been using this approach for years and find it useful (in certain situations). Others are new to it, and wanting to learn more about its strength and limitations. Finally, some UX researchers have already formed an opinion about online usability testing, and deemed it not useful for a variety of (unfounded) reasons. I hope by exposing these myths, we (as a UX community) can evaluate this tool based on its actual merits. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
