<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Sense of Minimum Viable Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnnyholland.org/2012/02/making-sense-of-minimum-viable-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2012/02/making-sense-of-minimum-viable-products/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s all about interaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 06:03:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Grimes</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2012/02/making-sense-of-minimum-viable-products/#comment-119265</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Grimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=16062#comment-119265</guid>
		<description>Greg, as a researcher and lecturer on the topic of entrepreneurship, I&#039;m extremely impressed with this article.  This post does better than any other I&#039;ve seen dealing with the topic of Minimum Viable Products, and I intend to ensure that students in my courses read and engage with what you&#039;ve written here.  Thanks for the practical yet sophisticated take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, as a researcher and lecturer on the topic of entrepreneurship, I&#8217;m extremely impressed with this article.  This post does better than any other I&#8217;ve seen dealing with the topic of Minimum Viable Products, and I intend to ensure that students in my courses read and engage with what you&#8217;ve written here.  Thanks for the practical yet sophisticated take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minimum Viable Product. What? &#124; Snagglepop</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2012/02/making-sense-of-minimum-viable-products/#comment-119047</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimum Viable Product. What? &#124; Snagglepop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=16062#comment-119047</guid>
		<description>[...] seems easy right? wrong. As Greg Laugero wrote &#8220;MVPs must make sense by creating meaning out of uncertainty and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems easy right? wrong. As Greg Laugero wrote &#8220;MVPs must make sense by creating meaning out of uncertainty and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meaning-making in minimum viable products &#171; Interaction Culture: The Class Blog</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2012/02/making-sense-of-minimum-viable-products/#comment-118606</link>
		<dc:creator>Meaning-making in minimum viable products &#171; Interaction Culture: The Class Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=16062#comment-118606</guid>
		<description>[...] This post from Greg Laugero on Johnny Holland was a big inspiration after I stumbled across it in my search for paper ideas. What I found interesting about this particular article was not just the focus on the business side of analysis, but rather its similarity to finding the &#8220;core&#8221; of a design that we&#8217;ve been taught (a connection I hadn&#8217;t really drawn before that). I believe that we as interaction designers here at IU have seen this process first-hand and have rather explicit feedback to seek out the &#8220;core&#8221; of the design first. We kind of &#8220;get&#8221; it already. But looking at this from a business angle, this whole idea of MVPs (minimum viable products) is an aspirational pipe-dream in many corporate settings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post from Greg Laugero on Johnny Holland was a big inspiration after I stumbled across it in my search for paper ideas. What I found interesting about this particular article was not just the focus on the business side of analysis, but rather its similarity to finding the &#8220;core&#8221; of a design that we&#8217;ve been taught (a connection I hadn&#8217;t really drawn before that). I believe that we as interaction designers here at IU have seen this process first-hand and have rather explicit feedback to seek out the &#8220;core&#8221; of the design first. We kind of &#8220;get&#8221; it already. But looking at this from a business angle, this whole idea of MVPs (minimum viable products) is an aspirational pipe-dream in many corporate settings. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Nordeng</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2012/02/making-sense-of-minimum-viable-products/#comment-118446</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Nordeng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=16062#comment-118446</guid>
		<description>Well said, and proven time and again.  The MVP has been championed on Kickstarter, nice to see it being expanded to include the business elements, not just the story elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, and proven time and again.  The MVP has been championed on Kickstarter, nice to see it being expanded to include the business elements, not just the story elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
