<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Johnny Holland &#187; Sally Bagshaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnnyholland.org/author/sally-bagshaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnnyholland.org</link>
	<description>It&#039;s all about interaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Producing quality content with multiple contributors</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/10/producing-quality-content-with-multiple-contributors/</link>
		<comments>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/10/producing-quality-content-with-multiple-contributors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally Bagshaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital UX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=8957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple tips to get things done]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="220" height="160" src="http://johnnyholland.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/cs2.jpg" class="attachment-index-categories wp-post-image" alt="cs2" title="cs2" /><p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9022" title="Content Strategy Week" src="http://johnnyholland.org/wp-content/uploads/csw-2.png" alt="" width="416" height="160" /><br />
You’ve probably heard the saying “too many cooks spoil the broth.”  It implies that having lots of people involved in the production of any one outcome isn’t a good thing. The same can be said for managing large websites. In fact, “too many authors spoil the content” is a much more pertinent issue in today’s digital world. Unfortunately it’s one that’s hard to escape.<span id="more-8957"></span></p>
<h2>Think about where you work</h2>
<p>In your organization, who writes your web content? Do you have a dedicated team of authors? Are they centralized, or are they spread out everywhere?</p>
<p>Regardless of where they sit, if you have a large website, you more than likely have many people writing content for it. You may have divisions or departments managing different sections—such as the corporate blog, product information, customer service, knowledge base, or promotional pages. Or it may take a lot of input from different subject matter experts to develop content in the first place. In either case, it can be challenging to continually produce quality content.</p>
<p>So what do you do?</p>
<p>Here are three practical ways to make things easier:</p>
<h2>1. Create a usable style guide</h2>
<p><strong> </strong><em>In the same way site content must be useful and relevant to your visitors, so should a style guide be useful and relevant to your authors.</em></p>
<p><strong><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Don’t turn into a boring ogre who jealously guards a monolithic style guide that no one wants to use.</span></strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">The bigger the style guide, the more daunting and confusing it becomes. Don’t get caught up including every possible style consideration you can think of. Instead, keep it smart, keep it simple, and include things like:</span></strong></strong></p>
<ul>
<liThe site’s key messages—what story are you trying to tell to your visitors?</li>
<li><Some sample personas of your customers or target audience.</li>
<li>The site’s personality and subsequent tone. Is it funny, cheeky, conservative or social?</li>
<li>The correct way to spell and punctuate your organization’s name (give examples).</li>
<li>The spelling and correct titles of your management team.</li>
<li>How you punctuate headings and titles (choose either sentence case or title case and stick with it).</li>
<li>Your stand on capitals—when it’s OK to use them for (names, divisions, headings, project names, and products).</li>
<li>Other punctuation tips such as the use of apostrophes, bullets, and acronyms.</li>
<li>How to write descriptive links with anchor text.</li>
<li>How to link to documents or downloads, and abbreviations for common downloads.</li>
<li>Clear links to other resources like the CMS user guide, metadata standards, and governance model.</li>
</ul>
<p>Stop the bickering about style and punctuation preferences by getting the guide signed off by senior management. There will always be different opinions—don’t waste energy being the referee if you don’t have to.</p>
<p>There are also some fantastic (existing!) style guides available online or in bookstores. You don’t need to re-invent the wheel—choose a guide that closely reflects your organization’s style, and use it in conjunction with a cheat sheet that can be pinned to the wall of every contributor for easy reference.</p>
<h2>2. Encourage learning and collaboration</h2>
<p><strong> </strong><em>Whether you’ve got a team sitting together or contributors scattered across the country—it’s important to unify authors so they are motivated to develop quality content.</em></p>
<p>When you have multiple authors, you also have multiple backgrounds, multiple strengths, and multiple weaknesses. The key challenge is to ensure that the strengths are shared and the weaknesses overcome:</p>
<ul>
<li>Get authors excited about why they are developing content in the first place. Connect the dots between business goals, website goals, and authors’ personal content goals. People learn best with examples so develop case studies to showcase success stories.</li>
<li>Create a collaboration space on the intranet so authors have easy access to each other and any documentation they need to do their job—such as the latest style guide, CMS documentation, processes and forms. The space shouldn’t be closed off from others in the organization. Give it high visibility to help promote web content style and standards for everyone.</li>
<li>Use the collaboration space as a learning centre, too. Add webinars, podcasts and links to content forums. If someone attends training, ask him to present or provide feedback to the group so that everyone benefits.</li>
<li>Any new author who joins the organization must be trained not only in how to use the CMS, but also in writing for the web, usability, and metrics. Buddy him up with another author so he has a mentor to guide him through the process.</li>
<li>Promote the notion of why instead of what. Why should the content go here, rather than what content should go here. This approach improves quality and encourages authors to be accountable for what is produced.</li>
<li>Show how web content fits in with the overall communication material of the organization. If the web team sits within a dedicated web or IT area, ensure there is some sort of liaison or relationship built with the marketing area so that key messages are reflected across all communication activities.</li>
</ul>
<h2>3. Use an author-friendly CMS</h2>
<p><strong> </strong><em>It sounds obvious, but a content management system (CMS) should actively enable quality content to be produced.</em></p>
<p>Don’t get me wrong; using a CMS to manage your website is smart. You just have to understand that it won’t solve all your content worries. You have to put thought into what you want your CMS to do, and how you want it to do it.</p>
<p>You want a system that is easy to use from the authors’ point of view. Here are some things to consider:</p>
<ul>
<li>The greatest web writer isn’t necessarily the greatest information architect, so as a rule don’t let authors make structural changes to the site.</li>
<li>Make it simple to keep content up-to-date by avoiding complex approval workflows for your content. It&#8217;s much better to have a simple process that everyone uses well, than a complex beast that authors do their best to avoid. Also, be wary of creating bottlenecks in your approval processes. Yes, you may need a senior manager to approve content at some point along the way—but if that requirement is going to clog up her inbox with requests, think of a better way to do it.</li>
<li>Keep it easy for authors to stick with the style guide when entering content. Enforce mandatory components where you can.</li>
<li>And finally…include a spell check. Sounds crazy, but I once worked on a project where a spell check in the CMS was an optional extra!</li>
</ul>
<p>With a little planning, it is possible to have great content on a site with many contributors. Dust off your style guide, keep everyone connected, and make sure your CMS is working for you and not against you.</p>
<p>What have your experiences been?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnnyholland.org/2010/10/producing-quality-content-with-multiple-contributors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
