<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Johnny Holland &#187; communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnnyholland.org/tag/communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnnyholland.org</link>
	<description>It&#039;s all about interaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Value of Asking &#8216;Why?&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2009/08/value/</link>
		<comments>http://johnnyholland.org/2009/08/value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Szuc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=3040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't just start... first start asking the right questions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="220" height="160" src="http://johnnyholland.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/why.jpg" class="attachment-index-categories wp-post-image" alt="why" title="why" /><p><a href="http://johnnyholland.org/wp-content/uploads/whywhy.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3171" title="whywhy" src="http://johnnyholland.org/wp-content/uploads/whywhy.png" alt="" width="416" height="160" /></a><br />
When looking at a product have you ever heard yourself saying <em>&#8220;why would anyone buy this?&#8221; </em>or <em>&#8220;why would people use this?&#8221; &#8211; </em>I have. Unfortunately, there have been many times when I look at products and experience the <em>&#8220;I don&#8217;t get it moment&#8221;</em>. I mean, I understand the functions being demonstrated but I don&#8217;t understand what problem the product team is trying to solve. So we put our doubts aside and start working on the product anyway as you know at some point you can help simplify, redesign and make usability improvements. But something still niggles at you. What is missing?<span id="more-3040"></span></p>
<h2>Understanding value</h2>
<p>The problem is we don&#8217;t spend enough time up front on projects discussing, assessing, defining and refining the value of what we make. We jump too quickly into design and build before applying rigor to what we make. Its easy to get lost in the product detail: a screen, code and forget what the product&#8217;s value is and who you are building it for. Everything we do should be to help move the product a little closer to success. Every question we ask, every <a id="gn:e" title="piece of research we do," href="http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/07/finding-gold-in-your-user-research-results.php">piece of research we do,</a> every design or sketch we make, every <a id="bsyj" title="product walk through" href="http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2007/06/walking-through-your-product-design-with-stakeholders.php">product walk through</a> we have with stakeholders, should all help iterate towards understanding the product value &#8211; the copy, a widget, a function, a screen, the product framework, the product, the product line and where that product line lives in and around other products in the company and the marketplace should say something about its value.</p>
<blockquote><p>we don&#8217;t spend enough time up front on projects discussing, assessing, defining and refining the value of what we make.</p></blockquote>
<h2><strong>Stop and assess</strong></h2>
<p>We must dedicate more time up front, at the start of any project or before we jump into developing a new feature, feature set or redesign effort to <em>better assess the value of stuff</em> we make. What makes people want something in the first place, use it, continue to use it, buy more of the same, treasure it and keep it? The following list is by no means exhaustive, rather it attempts to get to the heart of why something is valuable:</p>
<p>We should&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>do our homework and investigate how product decisions are made;</li>
<li>show how we can help the team make better product decisions;</li>
<li>provide research methods to test assumptions along the way;</li>
<li>ask: what does this product do? (what makes this product tick?);</li>
<li>ask: what do you love about the product? (why would you buy it?);</li>
<li>ask: what does the product team love about the product? (are they passionate about what they are working on?);</li>
<li>ask: what does sales love about the product? (are we helping them sell more?);</li>
<li>ask: could you sell the product? (if you were tasked to sell the product could you? Would you want to face customers with the product you have today?);</li>
<li>ask: what features would you sell? (any stand out features? any useless features? any features you would lead with when selling?);</li>
<li>ask: what are customers saying about the product? (does it really help them?);</li>
<li>ask: at what point would you want to throw the product away? (at what point does the product lose its value?);</li>
<li>ask: at what point would you want to upgrade? (what would you base your decision on?);</li>
<li>ask: how do you want the product to shine in the market place? (what would make it stand out?).</li>
</ul>
<p>By asking questions about the product and its value you are by doing this in fact <em>demonstrating value</em>. Your role is to test assumptions and ensure that you provide clear value for users and <em>determine what deeper research is needed</em>. That is the sweet spot &#8211; providing ways for us to manage, facilitate, guide and educate product teams to take the necessary time up front and at every stage to deliver value as we drive towards product success. We don&#8217;t do this enough and the product team often does not have a shared set of <a id="dbg1" title="design principles" href="http://www.google.com/corporate/ux.html">design principles</a>, philosophies or design tenets to hold onto as the product develops.</p>
<h2>Dont Ask Permission</h2>
<p><em>Ask yourself, is there general agreement on the team about the product&#8217;s value? Is this ever defined?</em> Don&#8217;t ask for permission. You are all in the right position now to question the value of what you work on and to help improve stuff. Questioning, improving upon and nailing down the value of something helps set our strategy in the right direction, helps us focus on building the right stuff and helps avoid storms ahead. So get clarity around:</p>
<ol>
<li>Understanding the value of what we do</li>
<li>Understanding the value of the stuff we work on</li>
<li>Showing the value of what we do to others</li>
<li>Appreciating the value of the people who end up using the products we make</li>
<li>Appreciating and leveraging on the value of the product team skills available to help make better stuff</li>
<li>Assessing and finding value up front before we start making stuff</li>
</ol>
<h2>So what stuff do you value in your life and why?</h2>
<p>I look forward to an ongoing discussion with you and to learn from your successes and failures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnnyholland.org/2009/08/value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question: When do you prefer video for communicating?</title>
		<link>http://johnnyholland.org/2008/12/when-do-we-prefer-video-as-a-medium-for-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://johnnyholland.org/2008/12/when-do-we-prefer-video-as-a-medium-for-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Koks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyholland.org/?p=661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A question towards you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="220" height="160" src="http://johnnyholland.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/talking.jpg" class="attachment-index-categories wp-post-image" alt="talking" title="talking" /><a href="http://johnnyholland.org/wp-content/uploads/topper.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-662" title="topper" src="http://johnnyholland.org/wp-content/uploads/topper.jpg" alt="" width="416" height="160" /></a>
<p>Have you ever heard of the so-called &#8216;Bandwidth hypothesis&#8217; in computer-mediated communications? It&#8217;s the hypothesis that for cognitive tasks, the more similar a medium is to face-to-face communication (the more bandwidth it has), the better the communication should be. Scientist have been trying to prove this for decades but they never succeeded.<span id="more-661"></span></p>
<p>Of course there are a lot of emotional aspects that play a big role. These aspects make face-to-face interaction a much richer experience than other (computer-mediated) interactions. But somehow they don&#8217;t seem to have any influence when it comes to the communication of cognitive tasks ((Whittaker S (2002). ‘Theories and methods in mediated communication)).</p>
<p>What does make a difference is speech. Research has shown that this makes the communication of cognitive tasks twice as effective. ((Chapanis A, Ochsman R &amp; Parrish R (1972). ‘Studies in interactive communication)) Knowing this, the <a title="bubblecomment post" href="http://johnnyholland.org/magazine/2008/12/leave-your-comments-behind/" target="_blank">bubblecomment post</a> from last week (which was about leaving video comments), left me with some questions. I didn&#8217;t leave a video comment. Why? I don&#8217;t really know. I just didn&#8217;t feel comfortable with it. But when do I prefer video, or a video chat to be more specific, as a medium for communication? When do I want or need my communication with someone else to be this rich. The only time I seriously engaged in a video chat, was with a friend who was living in Australia at the time and which I hadn&#8217;t seen for months. But that&#8217;s just me. So here is my question for you:</p>
<blockquote><p>When do you prefer video as a medium for communication? When not? And most of all, why?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnnyholland.org/2008/12/when-do-we-prefer-video-as-a-medium-for-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

